Search Result

Car make:
Car model:
Version:
Trim:

More Review

Sort by:

 
HATCHBACK (1993 - 1998)
2.0i 3dr
PROS: Great drive, image & relaibility, will go up to 180,000 miles easy; can get cheap...
CONS: GEARBOX!!! Failed twice. Known problem with boxes up to 1996 - won't get into reverse... more
 
HATCHBACK (1979 - 1994)
2.0 Turbo 5dr
PROS: safe reliable next classic...
CONS: expensive to fix if turbo or gearbox go... more
 
COUPE (1994 - 1998)
2.0i S 3dr
PROS: very reliable good looking great performance for its age...
CONS: espensive to repair ... more
 
SPECIAL EDITIONS (1985 - 1990)
Jubilee Hatchback 3dr
PROS: Beautiful Car - how many do you see on the road today?...
CONS: Auto makes it thirsty... more
 
HATCHBACK (1993 - 1998)
2.0 XS 5dr
PROS: Huge boot, ideal for families. Unlikely to break any landspeed records Very reliable...
CONS: when the reliability goes, it's pretty expensive. ... more
 
CONVERTIBLE (1994 - 1998)
2.3 SE 2dr Auto
PROS: grate car to drive nice place to be sat...
CONS: roofs broke on mine 1500 quid to fix... more
 
CONVERTIBLE (1994 - 1998)
2.3 SE 2dr
PROS: Cheap, comfortable, stylish, good spec, fast in a straight line...
CONS: Doesn't corner, things break ... more
 
HATCHBACK (1993 - 1998)
2.0i 5dr
PROS: Usual Swede, solid & relaible...
CONS: Base model, pretty basic, with a couple of extras... more
 
CONVERTIBLE (1994 - 1998)
2.0 S 2dr
PROS: very safe looks good reliable...
CONS: high fuel consumption not very fast... more
 
HATCHBACK (1993 - 1998)
2.0 SE Turbo 5dr
PROS: Handles the road well A lot of extras as standard for your money Extremely reliable ...
CONS: Parts expensive when they need replacing... more